OAO pos: skin
size/s: "Out-of-page"

OAO pos: top
size/s: "[[[970,250],[970,90],[728,90]],[[728,90]],[[320,50]]]"

Ask Paul: I’m 35 and only have $6000 in super

Dear Paul,

I'm a 35-year-old single woman with a $6000 super balance due to working for family for so many years. I am starting a public service job and hope to stay in the public service. 

I have been advised that I can now join a public service super fund or remain in my current fund, AustralianSuper. Both accounts have pros and cons. 

I come from a financially illiterate family and feel unsure of the best way forward for me. 

I could also use some tips on salary sacrifice to both improve my woeful super balance and for the first home buyer scheme.

A little advice would be priceless. Thank you. - Sally

Yours is a pretty common situation, Sally. Working, presumably, in a smaller, family-owned business is rarely good for your super.

The bigger issue here is that your new employer, the government, will pay into whatever super fund you choose. I am going to ask you to do a quick list of the pros and cons of the PSS fund you are being offered and AustralianSuper.

OAO pos: in_article_mrec_2
size/s: "[[[300,250],[300,250],[300,50]]]"

My guess is that AustralianSuper will offer you more investment options. This is important.

You are investing with a term of around 30 years. The one thing that helps with risk in investment markets is time.

So, in your shoes, I would be going for a high-risk option, investing mainly in growth assets - shares, property, infrastructure and private equity.

The first step is to compare the higher-risk options in your PSS fund and AustralianSuper and look at long-term returns.

Next, of course, are fees. I suspect you will find these pretty similar. Then we move to an important area, insurance. Here I suspect a PSS fund may give you better cover, possibly at no cost to you.

Once you suss out these three key areas, I know you will quickly come to the right conclusion.

Next, home ownership. Salary sacrifice will certainly boost your super in a tax-effective way. But I reckon you want to own a home before you retire, so here I agree with you about the first home buyer scheme.

A state-based first home buyer scheme is definitely worth considering, as is the federal First Home Super Saver (FHSS) scheme, where you can make before-tax contributions to your super, up to $15,000 a year, and withdraw up to a total of $50,000 to buy a home.

But the key here is how much you can save. Retirement for you is many decades away. I would argue that your order of priority is to, first, determine your savings capacity; second, take a look at the FHSS scheme and also first home buyer initiatives in your state. Then start saving!

Get stories like this in our

Comments

One response to “Ask Paul: I’m 35 and only have $6000 in super”

  1. Money magazine says:

    *EDITOR'S NOTE*
    Paul Clitheroe is unable to respond to questions posted here in the comments.
    Click here to ask your question: https://www.moneymag.com.au/contact

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Mandatory fields. All comments are moderate. Read the comments policy.

OAO pos: premium
size/s: "Out-of-page"